LDS Church Wants One Sided Blind Trust, Open Borders

LDS Church public affairs came out with this:

“The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has long expressed its position that immigration reform should strengthen families and keep them together. The forced separation of children from their parents now occurring at the U.S.-Mexico border is harmful to families, especially to young children. We are deeply troubled by the aggressive and insensitive treatment of these families. While we recognize the right of all nations to enforce their laws and secure their borders, we encourage our national leaders to take swift action to correct this situation and seek for rational, compassionate solutions.”

Oh really? They put the blame completely on the US. No where did they state that people should not violate a nation’s laws and sovereignty if they do not want to face the possibility of separation and other legal actions. No where did the church acknowledge the fact that separation occurs precisely to protect children if they are believed to be in danger or travelling with a non family member (a red flag for human trafficking). Nor did the church acknowledge that when an adult is arrested trying to enter the United States illegally that their children can not be with them in adult jail. And finally, the church did not acknowledge that the only option to keep parents and children together is to release them into the United States which means that anyone with a child can ignore United States borders and simply tell the United States that they are coming in, like it or not (ie the previous failed/destructive ‘catch-and-release’ policy).

Instead, the church seems to expect us to just blindly trust everybody who walks in with a child, no questions asked and to effectively have an open border. Are they seriously unaware of human trafficking and sex trafficking in minors? Evidently, they prefer we do believe the alien and release the minor and potential criminal into our population with no investigation. If we did follow such a path and see a wave a child abuse, the same people would be outraged and demanding consequences for those who enacted such a negligent and cruel policy.

The church has long tacitly encouraged illegal immigration and looked the other way as victims and citizens bear the costs. Does anyone have any recollection of the church being “deeply troubled” at the incentivization of unaccompanied minors (separated families) turning up in droves at the border during Obama’s tenure? I don’t.

Then there’s the one sided concern. Apparently, they couldn’t care less about separated families of citizens or legal immigrants accused of a crime who are incarcerated pending their trial (many of the kids end up under the care of social services). Does this mean they oppose that law? What about after a conviction, especially for a non-violent crime? How about CPS abuses?….No, ‘those people’ don’t matter and don’t get you social justice media brownie points.

If they and their congressional cohorts are really serious about this, rather than virtue signalling, let’s see them change the laws for all accused of a crime and absorb the costs of housing as ‘family units’ and investigating these folks themselves. The church could also pay all medical, education and other costs associated with the new families. They would also assume the liability if any child abuse occurs and deportation costs when such a policy inevitably leads to another spike in illegal entries. Or is it more likely they’ll just pass something that pushes more costs to us and leaves victims in it’s wake while they pat themselves on the back for their piety?

UPDATE: Just thought of this – Speaking of children, I haven’t seen any press releases about being deeply troubled over abortion. Nor do I recall any expression of being deeply troubled during Obama’s detention centers during the incentivized unaccompanied minor fiasco.

Oh, and…Surprise! Or something:
Top Senate Democrat Shoots Down Cruz’s Proposal to End the Family Separation Democrats and the Media Supposedly Care So Much About, In Order to “Keep the Focus on Trump”

…and bingo (watch the video).

Do the families separated by illegal aliens not deserve any attention…and what about those dirty Canadians detaining kids and separating families?

Advertisements

Must Watch: I’m The Majority

Just watch, there’s not much I can add.

“We’re the first ones taxed, and the last ones considered, and the first ones punished when things like this happen. Because our rights are the ones being taken away.”

Enough with leftists blaming good citizens and treading on rights of the law-abiding. I too am fed up with all the politicians coddling to the “loonies from the left”. We must start to fight and “raise hell” with the schools, city councils, legislatures, and organizations who bow down to the leftist minority who are either ignorant to realities and God-given rights or malevolently seek to deny them for their own power. I’m done with unprincipled politicians and organizations (including churches) who say we always have to compromise our natural and constitutional rights to speech and defense (among others) to some squeamish leftist social justice warrior when we’ve done nothing wrong and obey the law. They can take their despotic social justice and shove it.

LDS President Nelson And Firearm Laws

Quick blurb: Fox13 caught some statement LDS President Nelson made about firearm laws and featured it for a bit on their website. The main part they focused on is:

“…Well, God allows us to have our agency, and men have passed laws that allow guns to go to people who shouldn’t have them.”

A spokesman for the LDS Church said the quote speaks for itself.

I’ll be blunt. LDS Public Affairs is useless on this since the quote doesn’t really speak for itself. Without a specific example of a law, I have no idea whatsoever what he’s talking about. Besides the current State & Federal laws, Baker Act (and variants), NICS requirements, and ATF Form 4473, there are plenty of laws disqualifying people under various conditions (yes, including mental disorders) from possessing a firearm. So, quite contrary, men have passed laws to block guns going to people who shouldn’t have them (and respect constitutional due process requirements in stripping an individual of the right). Of course, criminals don’t really care about laws so they’ll always try their best to violate them but the law-abiding care and follow them.

Meanwhile, in terms of the Parkland shooting, it’s seems clearer that rather than a lack of laws, we’re seeing a lack of enforcement and due diligence based on the plethora of legal/school/social services interactions with the shooter and the subsequent (in)action by Broward County Sheriff Deputies. Should we look at tweaking laws and mental adjudication/commitment (which also respect constitutional rights) to avoid the failures we’re seeing? Sure. Same with hardening soft targets. But it seems like the first priority will be to address the causes of the failures and determine if priorities and processes rather than laws are what really need to be addressed.

Anyway, back to the statement. I’m basically left shrugging and finding he was expressing a personal opinion and may not have all the facts on hand (he also called the shooter a “sniper” which was not the case). That may well be why Public Affairs put out the statement they did – it was his opinion, what else can they say.

If, on the other hand, he was targeting the 2nd Amendment as a whole and plans on initiating a departure from church being stalwart defender of the US Constitution (including in doctrine), it would be a massive upheaval. Even with the recent weakness on individual rights, I don’t see that at all here, especially with Public Affairs’ quick punt.

Further reading:
Founders: Why the Bill of Rights (including the 2nd Amendment) is pointless.
Yep, the right to bear arms was always clearly intended as a personal right.

Utah Swamp Ruse 2018: Tricking You To Register To Vote And Share Personal Information

Last year, some Utah legislators tried to push through legislation effectively tricking people into unknowingly registering to vote and, thereby, gathering their personal information to sell and share with entrenched political parties and their cronies.

Well, “They’re baaaack…”

This year, we have Senator Deidre Henderson running the bill (SB 112 – Voter Registration Revisions) that would automatically register teens (18) and everyone else to vote when they go get their driver’s license and don’t read the fine print that they must opt-out. Once they’ve got your information, the Lieutenant Governor’s office ‘dutifully’ sells it to who ever wants the voter list and shares it with political cronies for their data mining.

The Utah voting list has turned up online and, best of all, includes birth dates to make it that much simpler for scammers to sort and target Utah’s elderly (click here for all posts on the voter list issue). But wait, there’s more: by cross linking to your driver’s license, they’ll be constantly updated with your latest contact information. That way if a lady tries to avoid a harasser or stalker by moving or changing their phone number, their tormentor need only pull the list and find the new phone/address. Really, the abuses by crooks and prying data-miners are endless*.

Of course, they bill is now sitting in the committee of Chicago politician and Utah’s biggest legislative swamp gator, Senator Curt Bramble. So I wouldn’t take it for granted that good legislators will quash the bamboozle. Please contact your Representative/Senator and ask them to oppose SB112 (and HB67 and HB154 – see update below).

UPDATE: More legislators are pushing this garbage. Here are two more bills: HB 67 (Rep. Stephen Handy, ran it last year too) and HB 154 (Karianne Lisonbee, WTH?!). Evidently, our political elite have determined to that your identity belongs to them and you are just a product to market.

*As I said last year: In Utah, however, registering to vote also means that the State will turn your information into a money making scheme by selling it to anyone willing to pay the Lieutenant Governor’s office. I’ve been tracking this for years. The only way to avoid this is to qualify and make your record “private” (contact your County Clerk for details on qualifications). This de facto public release results in a threat for unknowing voters who have security concerns (eg domestic abuse survivors etc) along with scam targets (the elderly via the list containing birth dates).

LDS Church Renews Tempting Soft Target Status For 2018

Last month I posted my annual warning/reminder about staying vigilant when attending services at an LDS church, particularly given the specific Daesh (ISIS) threat against the church. This month, I checked if anything had changed in terms of the church allowing members and visitors to have defensive means. Nope. The LDS church renewed its status as one of two churches in Utah to ban law-abiding citizens from possessing a firearm.

The ban is in effect for another year. Thus, if you attend church (or any ‘gun-ban’ public venue) this year, be sure to click the linked post and review the terrorism defense tips/links at the end of the post. Stay safe and good luck.

Daesh (ISIS) Now Specifically Threatens LDS Church (Annual Threat Update)

Apparently, this is turning into an annual Christmas tradition here. Two years ago, I posted about Daesh (ISIS) stating they would target churches in the US and last year I noted that they had reaffirmed that threat. Both times, I have highlighted LDS churches have been made into tempting soft targets. Just a week ago, Daesh demonstrated their appetite to kill at religious sites and the bloody carnage that results. That brings us to our third anniversary. This year, Daesh decided to not only reissue their threat but treat us with imagery specific to the LDS church (Image with LDS temple, terrorist, circulating online).

(KUTV) A disturbing, concerning image is circulating online claiming that a group is targeting the LDS temple in San Deigo, California. The picture which was allegedly released by a pro-ISIS media group shows a burning temple with an alleged member of ISIS looking on and the bloody words “Coming Soon.”

The FBI says they are “not aware of any specific and credible threat to [the LDS] community”. However, lone wolf and terrorist’s whole purpose is to fly under the radar.  The FBI isn’t able to catch everything; evidenced by recent terror attacks here and the still unresolved Vegas shooting (not to mention Fox 13’s report about Daesh recruiting in Utah). It is still up to individuals and organizations to maintain vigilance and situational awareness and be, preferably, granted a means of defense.

Unfortunately, we’re three years into this and folks are still stripped of the some excellent individual means of defense and a simple means to harden an exploitable soft target (i.e. the church’s firearms ban).

The article concludes with a U of U counter-terrorism expert:

“I think it warrants attention,” Guiora said. “We have a tendency to dismiss things that seem this can’t happen. but I think what we’ve learned in the past period – literally anything can happen. Terrorists say what they mean and they mean what they say.”

At the same time, Guiora said the last thing we want to do is stay home.

“You don’t want people to stay home, because if you stay home then terrorism wins,” he said.

I have to admit that it’s a bit more tempting to stay home when you’re denied a defensive ability and hindered in fulfilling a God-given duty to protect the innocent. It’s not all that fun being told to be a sitting duck. Regardless, to reiterate last year’s conclusion: As you go to church, pray, be vigilant, look for improvised means of defense and be ready to act. Please also review the following (also linked on my prior two posts on this subject):
Recognizing 8 Signs of Terrorism
How Situational Awareness Can Save Your Life In A Terror Attack

Stay vigilant and have a Merry Christmas!

Utah: De Facto Sanctuary State And Cities With Sanctuary Problems

Recently a criminal alien fugitive was caught in Utah. Jesus Guitron-Aguilera could be yet another poster child for the fruits of failure to enforce our immigration laws. He was convicted of sexual assault in 1992 yet able to hang around illegally, rack up some other convictions and ‘go on the lamb’ (and achieve ICE’s most wanted list). Well done ICE for catching this guy.

He appears to have been living in the Provo area for years. It really should come as no surprise since, with HB116, Utah and has put out the welcome mat for illegal and criminal immigrants of all stripes. Those putting out the welcome mat include Provo’s Mayor (John Curtis) who is now gunning for Chaffetz’s vacated seat in the House of Representatives.

Lifezette has an excellent write up (Criminal Aliens Taking Advantage of ‘Sanctuary’ Policies in Deep Red State) on why Guitron-Aguilera and others would feel quite comfortable here:

In Provo, both the mayor and the police department have made clear they’ll go soft on illegal immigrants, creating an ideal sanctuary for Guitron-Aguilera, who’d been convicted in Michigan in 1992 of felony sexual assault with an attempt to penetrate.

Last February, the Provo police chief instructed his officers that it was not their job to enforce federal immigration laws, and said that they would not work with federal authorities to detain or remove illegal aliens…

…In 2010, lawmakers were debating a bill to grant “guest worker” status to illegal immigrants — granting each a two-year work permit in the state. A similar bill passed the following year, with the support of the Republican governor, Gary Herbert. It did not take effect, however, as it would require a waiver from the federal government, which Utah is unlikely to ever get. But the bill was interpreted as a “message bill” — inviting illegal immigrants to come and work in the state without fear.

Please, read the article in full (it’s brief but I’m barely scraping the surface). The article quotes Chris Herrod who notes the pressure on the medical system and double standard law enforcement officers feel required to uphold. If we had a real E-Verify law, Guitron-Aguilera was probably using a false ID and would’ve been interdicted sooner but as Herrod notes:

“The establishment in this state has really pushed for sanctuary status,” said Herrod, saying there’s an “unhealthy relationship” between illegal aliens and big business in Utah.

“That lobby is very, very strong,” he told LifeZette.

No kidding. It includes the Salt Lake Chamber of Commerce and LDS Church Public Affairs, among others.

Maybe States, Cities, and other enablers would think twice about perpetuating the problem if they were subject to the same fines we’re beginning to see private business face from the Trump admin.

Note: Changed “Provo” to “Provo area” as I’m not positive if he was in Provo itself the entire time.